The Good Shepherd and Stephen King’s Low Men (a Steve Orr Lectionary Reflection)

“In their true form, they appear as rat-like humanoids, complete with fleas, lice, and, sometimes, rabies.”

Stephen King has created some very intriguing supernatural characters over the years. And, while his main characters are almost always captivating folk, drawing us ever deeper into King’s tales, it is sometimes his lesser characters that really capture our interests and imagination. One group King invented — and which appear in many of his stories, novels, and novellas — are his “low men.”

These low men usually show up to perform distinct, limited —usually bad— actions and then, fairly quickly, move off the stage. They’re pretty horrible: in their true form, they appear as rat-like humanoids, complete with fleas, lice, and, sometimes, rabies. They dress in garishly colored, out-of-fashion clothing, and they drive what appear to be — but might not actually be — vintage cars. There is no question as to how King wants his readers to regard these creatures. If having the heads of rats isn’t frightening enough, the fact that they walk among us on two legs just ratchets up the creep factor. And in every scene, we always have the sense that things are about to go from bad to worse.

But King doesn’t need the supernatural to write “low” characters. Consider Greg Stillson in The Dead Zone, Ace Merrill in Stand By Me, and Percy Wetmore in The Green Mile, to name a few. They are all “low men” of the very human type; people of low character who act in villainous ways.

But we don’t need fiction to think of such folk. We’ve met some, haven’t we?

And that brings us to this week’s Lectionary passage from the Gospel of John. In it, Jesus contrasts himself (“the good shepherd”) with those who, by their acts of low character, have proved themselves to be bad shepherds. Of those “low men,” Jesus says that, upon seeing wolves threaten the sheep, they will run away and leave the sheep to the wolves. The result? Some of the sheep are “snatched” by the wolves, an event that will surely lead to their deaths, while others are “scattered” in fear for their lives.

The bad shepherd “runs away” because the bad shepherd “does not care for the sheep.” By contrast, Jesus tells us that the good shepherd will do all he can to protect and save the sheep, even going so far as to lay down his life for them. Jesus wanted everyone to understand that the measure of whether a shepherd is good or bad is based on what the shepherd does for the sheep. Most importantly, Jesus wanted everyone to know that everyone has a choice, Him included.

Psalm 23 underscores that David had chosen the good shepherd to be his shepherd. Also, the 1st John passage shows how John didn’t just report what Jesus taught about the good shepherd. He fully incorporated it into his own teaching, further advocating that we should imitate the good shepherd in “truth and action.”

One could reason that Stephen King’s “low men” are the way they are because of what they are; that they have no real choice other than to be low. By contrast, Jesus did not lay down his life because it was destined or coerced. He had the power and authority to choose.

He chose that because He is the good shepherd.

_________________________
PHOTO: https://www.rspca.org.uk/adviceandwelfare/farm/sheep
_________________________
READINGS FOR THE COMING WEEK
Fourth Sunday of Easter (April 22, 2018)
https://lectionary.library.vanderbilt.edu//

Acts 4:5-12
Psalm 23
1 John 3:16-24
John 10:11-18

_________________________

Join us Friday morning when we, once again, share a meal, say a prayer, and discuss one or more of this week’s Lectionary passages. DaySpring’s Lectionary Breakfast still meet at 8:00 in the function room of the Waco “Egg and I” restaurant.

Shepherd or sheep, all are welcome.

Blessings,
Steve

The Monster Words (a Lectionary reflection by Steve Orr)

"Monsters, stay out of this room!
You have no business here.
N0 monsters under the bed!
You can't fit under there.
No monsters hiding in the closet!
It's too small in there.
No monsters outside of the windows!
You can't hold on out there.
No vampires, no werewolves, no things that bite.
You have no business here.
Nothing will touch you, or hurt you, all this night.
You have no business here."

-------- Stephen King's Cujo


The "monster words" are what Vic (the father) chants at bedtime so Tad (his very young son) will stop worrying about the monsters he believes are in his closet. It's a loving thing for a father to do.

If he believes the evil is not real.

When Vic needs to go on a business trip, he writes the incantation down on a piece of paper so Donna (the mother) can read it to Tad while Vic is gone. Eventually, Tad begins carrying the folded piece of paper in his pocket. He touches it whenever he feels afraid. Doing that gives him a little relief.

Of course, being a Stephen King novel, Cujo delivers a lot for Tad to fear. And I don't think I'm giving anything away when I tell you that the "monster words" are not wholly successful as the talisman against evil Tad wants them to be.

The same is true for us.

In Jacqueline Bussie's book, Outlaw Christian: Finding Authentic Faith by Breaking the Rules, she plows right into our tendency to use our own "monster words" to shield us from the harsh realities of our lives. Sure, there are times of joy and wonderment. But there are also times when things are so bad we wish we could "explain away evil and suffering with a theo-magical slight of hand."

When faced with betrayal, suffering, fear, terror, and death (ours or anyone else's), we armor ourselves with the "marshmallow armor" of religious platitudes, pious clichés, scriptures taken out of context, misquoted and/or misapplied theology: our monster words. We draw temporary (and truly unsatisfactory) relief from just having them near; being able to speak them into any terrible event.

When asked for whom her book was written, Bussie said, "If you are a person who has ever loved someone, lost them, and then heard the hidden question why blacksmith your heart so hard it felt like your ears bled, this book was written with you at heart."

If you are struggling with such hard things, then you may find some (true) relief in knowing that others are, too. Whether we can admit it or not, we all struggle with realigning our old ways of thinking with the dynamic new ways we are called to by Jesus.

Witness the "circumcised believers" in this week's Lectionary selection from Acts. They cannot seem to move past the requirements of the Law. After Peter returns from preaching to and baptizing Cornelius and his household (none of whom were Jewish), these "circumcised believers" interrogate Peter, saying, "Why did you go to uncircumcised men and eat with them?!"

You can read the story, yourself, and you should. The point is well made by Peter, and it's one we need to roll forward into our own faith-walk: when God points us in another direction, we can faithfully move in that direction. We are not enslaved to the old ways just because they are the comfort zone. In fact, if there's an ultimate point to the Book of Acts, it is that God is doing something new, something true and authentic, something that does not hide from the bad parts of life.

In real life, we are rarely removed from the hard bits. We must go through them. We don't need "monster words" on which to rely. We have the Holy Spirit and the promise that, regardless of how bad it gets, God is in it with us.
_________________________

READINGS FOR THE COMING WEEK
Fifth Sunday of Easter (April 24, 2016)
First reading
Acts 11:1-18
Psalm
Psalm 148
Second reading
Revelation 21:1-6
Gospel
John 13:31-35
_________________________

Join us Friday mornings? We still meet at the Waco "Egg and I" restaurant. Lectionary Breakfast starts at 8:00 and is an hour when a lot of truth is spoken.

Enjoy the week!
Steve

The Snow Queen (a Lectionary reflection by Steve Orr)

From the very beginning, when the writers, animators, and directors first started crafting Disney's Frozen---and for a very long, long time after that---Elsa was the villain of the piece.

When they started, they were telling the story of "The Snow Queen," Hans Christian Andersen's fairy tale of the evil woman who captured a boy's heart and kept him prisoner in her icy realm. And they relished the possibility of creating a new, iconic Disney villain; someone to join such evildoers as Ursula, Scar, Captain Hook, and Cruella de Vil.

Everything was in place to do that. The Snow Queen has formed the basis for many a literary villain. Author after author has used her evil for their variations on the theme. Take C. S. Lewis' White Witch in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe: she was so evil she had transformed Narnia into a land where it "was always winter, but never Christmas."

But, as anyone who has seen Frozen knows, that is NOT what happened in the movie. Elsa did NOT become the villain of Frozen. And now that we know the disparity between the original plan and the eventual outcome, we have to ask: what changed?

It was the song.

Animated movies, particularly Disney animated movies, are complex enterprises with many pieces, most of which move along on parallel tracks at the same time. Story writers, song writers, artists, etc., are all working on the same project, but are not in contact with each other every day. So, perhaps it is understandable that those helming the movie did not hear the song "Let It Go" until later in the process. But when they finally heard it, well . . .

It changed everything.

Suddenly, based on the lyrics of that song, Elsa was no longer a two dimensional villain, but rather a complex person who had reasons for freezing everyone out. You've heard the song and you've seen the changes it wrought.

We are like Elsa. As it says in this week's Lectionary selection from Romans 8, we are in suspense until God fulfills our hope for redemption. We find we must await the work of the Spirit in our lives; "to help us in our weakness," to intercede for us while we are still in flux, to lead us through the process of becoming.

When they started, Elsa was the villain. When they finished their work, she was the redeemed.

_______________________________________

READINGS FOR THE COMING WEEK
http://lectionary.library.vanderbilt.edu

Day of Pentecost (May 24, 2015)
Acts 2:1-21 or Ezekiel 37:1-14
Psalm 104:24-34, 35b
Romans 8:22-27 or Acts 2:1-21
John 15:26-27; 16:4b-15

_______________________________________

How great it would be to see you at Lectionary Breakfast this Friday morning! If you can, meet us at 8:00 at the Waco "Egg and I" for a hearty breakfast, enjoyable companions, and life-changing scripture.

No one gets the cold shoulder.

Enjoy the week!
Steve

Complicit (a Lectionary reflection by Steve Orr)

Do you know the name, Lewis Powell? If so, then you get a gold star. Most people, even if they've heard it before, can't think why it should be memorable. Lewis Powell was involved in what many consider one of the greatest tragedies (if not THE greatest tragedy) in the history of the United States of America.

Well, that certainly narrows it down. No? OK, I won't keep you in suspense. Lewis Powell, and his friend George Atzerodt (another name you probably don't recognize), were accomplices of John Wilkes Booth.

Booth and his accomplices originally planned to kidnap President Abraham Lincoln, Vice President Andrew Johnson, and Secretary of State William Seward (of "Seward's Folly" fame). Then, as we all know, things changed. Their goal had always been to cripple the Union by removing the President and those immediately in line to replace him. But when kidnapping proved impossible, Booth decided assassination was their only other option.

We all know Booth's name. It is infamous. Not only did he assassinate the President, but his act, all by itself, led to the extremely harsh Reconstruction period the South had to endure following the Civil War. Lincoln had made it clear he desired a kindler, gentler reabsorption of the South into the Union. With his mediating influence gone, the hammer came down and came down hard.

Booth was gunned down by Federal troops at a farm in Virginia less than two weeks after the assassination. But what about the other two guys? Powell went to Seward's house, stabbed and seriously wounded him (but Seward survived). Atzerodt could not bring himself to attempt to assassinate Vice President Johnson (he went out drinking, instead). Nevertheless, both hanged for their roles as accomplices.

And that brings us to this week's Lectionary passages. I've read two of these stories many, many times: the murder of Naboth for his vineyard (1st Kings) and the murder of Uriah the Hittite for his wife (2nd Samuel). But on every other reading I missed something, something pretty significant.

These murderers had accomplices.

I have always focused on the actions of Ahab and Jezebel that led to Naboth's death. And, of course, we know of David's lust and how it led to the death of Bathsheba's husband. But none of these villains acted alone. Jezebel involved the "leaders and nobles" of Naboth's city in her murder plot. And David involved Joab, his chief military commander, as well as who knows how many troops, in leaving Uriah alone and unprotected in combat.

We eventually learn of God's response to the actions of Ahab, Jezebel, and and David for their evil machinations. Even though none of the three actually committed the act, God punished them harshly. But we never read anything about their accomplices. I think I know the reason for that.

I doubt these other people escaped the consequences of their complicity. "What goes around comes around" has always been truth. You do, in fact, reap what you sow. But I think the reason these are not reported to us in scripture is this: because some people are leaders while most people are led, the greatest consequence must fall upon the leaders.

Our takeaway? We should look around us and consider just who it is we lead (because there are always some that follow us). Then we should take a little time to reflect on just exactly where it is we are leading them and what is we are leading them to do.

###############################
http://lectionary.library.vanderbilt.edu

READINGS FOR THE COMING WEEK
Proper 6 (11) (June 16, 2013)

1 Kings 21:1-10, (11-14), 15-21a
Psalm 5:1-8
2 Samuel 11:26-12:10, 13-15
Psalm 32
Galatians 2:15-21
Luke 7:36-8:3

We would love for you to join us at Lectionary Breakfast some Friday morning. We're at The Egg and I (Franklin and New Road in Waco) from about 8:00 am to about 9:00 am. Good food and even better company.

Enjoy the week!
Steve

Rule Number 8

Photo by Stephen Orr

Rule Number 8
(a brief-ish Lectionary reflection by Steve Orr)

I don't know how much attention you pay to the internal workings of today's companies.  It is one of the things that seems to have been a significant part of my life for several decades.  I am fascinated by how they work, how they function and dysfunction, how they succeed, and how they fail.  I am particularly drawn to the company philosophies, both formal and informal; as well as those that live out an unacknowledged philosophy.  All companies have them, it's just that some companies don't know they have them.  This fascination is one of the reasons I loved reading "Good To Great" by Jim Collins and crew.

Lately, I've been looking at companies referenced in a book entitled "The Definitive Drucker" (about Peter Drucker, "the father of modern management"); an absolute goldmine of information put together by Elizabeth Haas Edersheim (who was granted unprecedented access to Mr. Drucker the last 16 months of his life, and then produced this book from their discussions).  Throughout the book, examples are presented from real companies.

And that's how I got to Google.

Google's philosophy has been encapsulated into 10 golden rules for operating their business.  You would not be surprised, I think, to learn Google encourages creativity or that they operate with considerable consensus-building, or even that almost every decision is driven by quantitative analysis.  These are but three of the key operating philosophies that guide the internet behemoth.  And when you think about it, they sound like what you would expect from Google.  However, you might be surprised to learn Rule Number 8.

Don't be evil.

The concept was first suggested at Google by employees Amit Patel and Paul Buchheit (the creator of Gmail).  Buchheit said he "wanted something that, once you put it in there, would be hard to take out."  It went on to appear in Google's 2004 IPO prospectus in a letter from Google's founders (it became known as the "Don't Be Evil" manifesto).  The letter stated: "Don't be evil.  We believe strongly that in the long term, we will be better served --- as shareholders and in all other ways --- by a company that does good things for the world even if we forgo some short term gains."

It should be no surprise to find that Google CEO Eric Schmidt (now Executive Chairman) included it in his "10 Golden Rules for Knowledge Workers" as Rule Number 8.  Schmidt said, "Much has been written about Google's slogan, but we really try to live by it, particularly in the ranks of management."

I've been told that Kurt Kaiser once said, "You can live your entire life by a wonderful lyric" (Kurt, did you say that?).  I really LIKE that, and I can see how it can be true.  For me, that lyric might be "I will stand by you" from the song by The Pretenders.  But I can see how a motto could work the same way.  Frankly, I think "Don't Be Evil" is hard to beat as a motto.  For me, it ranks right up there with the Hippocratic Oath and Sun Tzu's "The best battle is the battle won without being fought."

For all of that, it is not a new idea.  Yes, it is surprising (and quite nice) to see a corporation put it out there for everyone to see (and to judge them by).  But the concept has been around a very long time.  For example, I am pretty sure David was aware of it.

You know, we're all weak in one way or another; many ways, really.  The Bible clearly states that we all fall short (<-- "sin" means "to miss the target").  King David apparently had some weakness when it came to beautiful women; thus, his seduction of Bathsheba and his accumulation of wives.

But there's weakness and then there's evil.  David crossed over when he sent Bathsheba's husband back to the front lines carrying his own death sentence.

Don't be evil.

###############################
READINGS FOR THE COMING WEEK
http://lectionary.library.vanderbilt

Proper 12 (17) (July 29, 2012)
2 Samuel 11:1-15
Psalm 14
2 Kings 4:42-44
Psalm 145:10-18
Ephesians 3:14-21
John 6:1-21

Join us if you can on Friday morning.  As is our practice, we will be at Cafe Cappuccino (downtown Waco, on 6th near the Courthouse) at 8:00 to discuss this week's scripture passages and to scarf down some great food.

The pancakes are not evil; however, they are really, really big!  ;-)

Enjoy the week!
Steve

The Lamb Thief

The first time I heard Keith Green sing, he was already dead.  

I was driving down the street, listening to the radio.  I didn't know he was dead, so that didn't influence my opinion of his performance.  Maybe if I had known I might have cut him some slack.  As it was, what I heard didn't impress me.  I didn't know he had been somewhat controversial, and I didn't know that he had written, co-written, and performed many best selling songs.  All I knew at the time was what I heard on the radio that day, and, as I later learned, it was not a song for which he was especially well known.

The piano accompaniment which Green was playing was slow, laconic, almost wandering; just about the exact opposite of the usual pieces I heard on the radio.  There was no driving back beat from a bass guitar, no drums to draw the singer back to the appropriate pace.  His voice was, well, not exceptional in any way.  He just sounded like a guy singing.  I found myself wondering just why this piece had made it to the radio, at all.

And then, there were the words.  They didn't rhyme, which was very odd; in fact, there appeared to be no attempt to come up with a rhyming pattern of any kind; not even words that didn't rhyme but almost did.  It moved so slowly, it sounded like he was almost reading something to music.  At that point, I was reaching for the controls to change the station.

But then, I REALLY heard the words.  And I stopped; my hand hovering over the controls.

"Create in me a clean heart, oh God
And renew a right spirit within me.
Cast me not away from thy presence, oh Lord
Take not thy Holy Spirit from me.
Restore unto me the joy of thy salvation,
And renew a right spirit within me."

THAT struck a nerve.  I had that feeling I had heard something like that before.  I know this is cliche, but it's true: I pulled my car over to the side of the road and listened to the rest of the song.  And when it was over, I pulled out my Bible and started searching.  By then, I was certain the man had been singing scripture, and almost verbatim.  I was used to songs ABOUT things in the Bible, but this--this singing verses without forcing them into some kind of rhyme--this was something a bit new to me.

And I found it.  In Psalms 51.  And I knew why it seemed so familiar.  David wrote this song after Nathan, God's Prophet, told him a story.  In the story, a man--a rich man; one with plenty of everything; power, wealth, accolades--stole, slaughtered, and ATE a poor man's only lamb rather than one of his own many lambs.  Scripture says David burned with anger against the man and said to Nathan, "As surely as the Lord lives, the man who did this must die!" (2 Samuel 12:5 NIV).

Then Nathan, who already knew that David had secretly had sex with Bathsheba and arranged for her husband to be killed in battle, turned on David and declared, "YOU are the man!"

Ever have one of those moments?  That awful slice of time when it is shoved in your face that what you have done is not only wrong (really, REALLY wrong), but KNOWN!  It was a shocking wake-up for King David.  And it made an impact.

David, finally remorseful for his actions, feels the full force of being cut off from God by his sin.  And he writes what we now call Psalm 51 to express his remorse and desire to be forgiven.

You may have done some terrible things in your life.  David certainly did.  Don't let those decisions and actions keep you from God.  I encourage you to embrace the words of Psalm 51 as your prayer of forgiveness and reconciliation.  Yes, there are always consequences for our actions, and our bad actions can come with some pretty horrific consequences.  David's did.  

I was ungracious during that first minute of listening to Keith Green sing his song.  But by the end I began to grasp what he undoubted already knew.  With that particular song, the words are far too important to let them be overshadowed by anything, even the music.  Even the performer.  What I learned is this: if I am willing to change, God is willing to forgive, to restore and renew, and even create in me a clean heart.


###############################
READINGS FOR THE COMING WEEK
http://lectionary.library.vanderbilt.edu/

Fifth Sunday in Lent (March 25, 2012)
Jeremiah 31:31-34
Psalm 51:1-12 or Psalm 119:9-16
Hebrews 5:5-10
John 12:20-33

Annunciation of the Lord (March 25, 2012)
Isaiah 7:10-14
Psalm 45 or Psalm 40:5-10
Hebrews 10:4-10
Luke 1:26-38

Will you be in Waco Friday morning?  If so, join us for breakfast at 8:00 at Cafe Cappuccino (downtown on 6th, near the Courthouse).  We have a great time discussing the coming week's passages, and the food is delicious :-)

Enjoy the week!
Steve